| 個人檔案Apathygrrl: Puttin' the ...相片部落格清單 | 說明 |
|
2月21日 the rant about the Muhammad cartoonsLet me start by saying that I have seen these cartoons and I don't find them funny in the least. If you don't know what cartoons I am referring to I recommend not going to search for them as they are a waste of the paper they were originally drawn on. I'm not a Muslim but I was offended by them.
Some Danish cartoonists for some reason felt the need to draw a dozen or so caricatures of Muhammad and print them in the newspaper Jyllands-Posten. One of the cartoons depict Muhammad with a large bomb in his turban, another shows Muhammad on a cloud telling two newly arrived dead suicide bombers "Stop, we have run out of virgins." These cartoons were then circulated around the globe, causing riots and violent protests everywhere, especially in the Middle East.
All I have to say is :
DUH!!!
What the hell did you think was going to happen??? You take a religious icon that is very important to a large percentage of the globe and make insensitive, insulting, and blasphemous cartoons... and you didn't expect people to get angry?? Are you stoned or stupid? First off I'm going to let you in on a little bit of information that apparently these Danish cartoonist didn't know: In the many Muslim traditions it is considered sacrilege to draw/paint/create a likeness of Muhammad. It may seem odd to a lot of people who are used to having seen many pictures of people of worship (eg. painting of Jesus Christ). So mistake #1 was just drawing Muhammad. Mistake #2 was drawing an insulting charicature of Muhammad. Mistake #3 was printing this in a paper where many Muslims will see it. Denmark does have a substantial Muslim population and they were obviously furious. I mean it was the worst possible thing to draw at the worst possible time. Presently a large percentage of the rest of the world is trying hard to create peace in the middle east, you just hit a hornet's nest with a baseball bat. Mistake #4 was picking the worst possible time in history to unveil these drawings. Your mama must be damn proud of you.
I'm not all for censorship or anything but this really isn't about censorship... this is more about stopping a hate crime. I am all for freedom of speech but there is a difference between freedom of speech and promoting hatred and bigotry. If Hitler were alive today would we give him his own column in the newspaper to write about whatever he wanted? Hell no! He would write anti-Semitic propaganda. That is a hate crime and hate crimes are not freedom of speech. These cartoons constitute a hate crime. They were drawn to deliberately provoke, offend, and aggravate Muslims during a time of great strife and turmoil for those people.
Hypothetical situation... lets say I work in a large newspaper in the southern USA. Right after 9/11 happens I draw a few cartoons in the newspaper. One cartoon depicts the Pope sodomizing Jesus Christ dressed as an altar boy while the Pope shouts "Yeah, take it bitch! I'm gonna make you squeal like a pig!" and Jesus is crying. Another cartoon depicts a trailer trash couple with the barefoot and pregnant wife crying telling the drunken husband "Honey, I've lost the baby." and the caption underneath reads "God loves abortions."
Can you imagine how many Americans would come to my house and lynch me? Cartoons like those would never have been printed, especially at that point in time, and it's not because of censorship, it's the stopping of a hate crime. Those example cartoons have no merit, there is no message in them, other than hatred. The same is true for the Muhammad cartoons. To be entitled to freedom of speech you must have something worthwhile to say. Most of the Muhammad cartoons have the feeling as though they were drawn with a poison-filled pen. This is not freedom of speech, this is slander, this is bigotry, this is a hate crime.
Locally a university professor posted a few of these cartoons on his office door sparking protests from Muslim students and some of that professor's colleagues. You'd think a supposed educated man would know better than to do something so stupid.
A high school student posted a few of the cartoons in the most recent copy of his school newspaper. The newspaper has been terminated and the boy was told to write an apology. He said in an interview that he doesn't believe he did anything wrong and doesn't feel he should apologize. His parents should smack some sense into that kid. Racism should not be tolerated. Bigotry should not be tolerated. Oh how I wish I had that kid's email... I'd send him this rant. I hope that he learns to open his eyes and see the destruction and anger things like this can cause. This is the reason that there are a few limitations to freedom of speech. I don't mean that everything that might possibly offend someone needs to be censored, far from it. What I mean is that something that OBVIOUSLY will enrage a large population and does nothing but breed more hatred and bigotry should be censored. It does nobody any good to be the cause of violence. This kind of stupidity gives me a headache.
I hope that those of you who read this can see what I'm trying to say... I don't like censorship any more than most people but there is a point where you have to draw the line to stop an inevitable violent outbreak. There were more than 40 Danish cartoonists contacted to submit drawings of Muhammad and only 12 responded... those who didn't should be congratulated that their "Bad Idea" alarms are in working order. Thank you.
A final note to Muslims and to the rest of the world: Please, please, please calm down... violence does nothing but beget more violence. Please use words, not fists, and be constructive. An intelligent, thought-provoking rebuttal will go a lot farther than you think.
回應 (2)
引用通告 (1)此內容的引用通告是: http://apathygrrl.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!5712E5E005791E46!324.trak 引述這則內容的部落格
|
|
|